🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of nations are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that phones and apps are "robbing our kids' youth". A law could be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban could be "one of the options on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked parliament to pass a bill raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a similar action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a solid first step," stated a leading European lawmaker behind the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the administration has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any action must be "grounded in robust research".

Previously, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the administration committed to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. An organization established by the family of a young person who was lost after viewing dangerous platform posts suggests that a strict age ban may not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to build products and services that are appropriate and suitable for children," said a prominent peer.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, legislation is primarily unfolding at the regional level amid country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with additional time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted measures requiring parental consent for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various politicians to follow Australia's example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Beyond the West, other countries are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international bodies strike a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

While this global discussion evolves, the policies of this nation and its followers demonstrate that policymakers globally are increasingly prepared to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.