🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear Ruben Amorim endured defeat by Grimsby. He weathered a decisive European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, squandering the team's most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for failing in individual battles crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this whole bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been easy, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view him as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, he has demonstrated as one of the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind of which the club's competitors are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Over System and Philosophy

To illustrate, this was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored formation. Naturally, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach of play “will be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Who else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have these guys set up? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to decide the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who will adapt their methods to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or fails of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him live to blunder another day.

The Neoliberal Football: Responsibility Only for the Few

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss him for playing excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and later bin them for requiring excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.